Andersson, L-G. (1975). Form and function of subordinate clauses. Gothenburg monographs in linguistics 1. Goteburg: University of Goteburg Department of Linguistics

Besnier, N. (1988). The linguistic relationships of spoken and written Nukulaelae registers. Language, 64, 707-736.

Bever, T., & Townsend, D. (1979). Perceptual mechanisms and formal properties of main and subordinate clauses. In W. Cooper & E. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing (pp. 159-226). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Biber, D. (1985). Investigating macroscopic textual variation through multifeature/multidimensional analyses. Linguistics, 23, 337-360.

Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bolinger, D. (1978). Pronouns in discourse. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 12 (pp. 289-309). New York: Academic Press.

Brandt, D. (1986). Toward and understanding of context in composition. Written communication, 3, 139-157.

Chafe, W. (1976). Givenness, constrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and points of view. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25-55). New York: Academic Press.

Chafe, W. (1986). Writing in the perspective of speaking. In C. Cooper & S. Greenbaum (Eds.), Studying writing: Linguistic approaches (pp. 12-39). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Colomb, G. & Williams, J. (1985). Perceiving structure in professional prose. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 87-128). New York: Guilford Press.

Connors, R. & Lunsford, A. (1988). Frequency of formal errors in current college writing. College composition and communication, 39, 395-409.

Cooper, M. (1986). The ecology of writing. College English, 48, 364-375.

Crystal, D. (1980). Neglected grammatical factors in conversational English. In S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, & J. Svartvik (Eds.), Studies in English linguistics (pp. 153-166). London: Longman.

Curme, G. (1931). A grammar of the English language, volume II: Syntax. Essex, CT: Verbatim.

Danes, F. (1964). A three-level approach to syntax. Travaux linguistiques de Prague, 1, 225-240.

Dillon, G. (1981). Constructing texts. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Ervin-Tripp, S. (1972). On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-occurrence. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 213-250). New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.

Faigley, L. (1979). The influence of generative rhetoric on the syntactic maturity and writing effectiveness of college freshmen. Research in the teaching of English, 13, 197-206.

Faigley, L. (1986). Competing theories of process: A critique and a proposal. College English, 48, 527-542.

Firbas, J. (1964). On defining theme in functional sentence analysis. Travaux linguistiques de Prague, 1, 267-380.

Firbas, J. (1966). Non-thematic subjects in contemporary English. Travaux linguistiques de Prague, 2, 239-254.

Flower, L., Hayes, J., Carey, L., Schriver, K., & Stratman, J. (1986). Detection, diagnosis, and strategies of revision. College composition and communication, 37, 16-55.

Fries, P. (In press). Patterns of information in initial position in English. In P. Fries and M. Gregory (Eds.), Discourse in society: Functional perspectives. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishers.

Givon, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. San Diego: Academic Press.

Haiman, J. & Thompson, S. (1984). "Subordination" in universal grammar. In C. Brugman and M. Macaulay (Ed.), Proceedings of the tenth annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistics society (pp. 510-523). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Part 2. Journal of linguistics, 3, 177-274.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1970). Language structure and language function. In J. Lyons (Ed.), New horizons in linguistics (pp. 140-164). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1987). Spoken and written modes of meaning. In R. Horowitz & S. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 55-82). San Diego: Academic Press.

Hamp-Lyons, Liz. (2014)Review of Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres, Journal of English for Academic Purposes 16, pp. 93-95

Hoey, M. (1986). Overlapping patterns of discourse organization and their implications for clause relational analysis in problem-solution texts. In C. Cooper and S. Greenbaum (Eds.), Studying writing: Linguistic approaches (pp. 187-214). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

House, E. & House, W. (1980). Some similarities and differences between compositions written by remedial and non-remedial college freshmen. Paper, Annual meeting of the Conference on college composition and communication. ERIC Document 186 931.

Kies, D. (1988). Marked themes with and without pronominal reinforcement: Their distribution and meaning in discourse. In E. Steiner and R. Veltman (Eds.) Pragmatics, discourse and text (pp. 47-75). London: Pinter Publishers.

Kies, D. (forthcoming). What remedial writing at the college level reveals about writing assessment and the writing process. English quarterly.

Kuno, S. (1973). The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Maimon, E. (1978). Measuring syntactic growth: Errors and expectations in sentence-combining practice with college freshmen. Research in the teaching of English, 12, 233-244.

Mann, W. & Thompson, S. (1986). Relational propositions in discourse. Discourse processes, 9, 57-90.

MacWhinney, B. (1977). Starting points. Language, 53, 152-168.

Pawley, A. & Syder, F. (1983). Natural selection in syntax: Notes on adaptive variation and change in vernacular and literary grammar. Journal of pragmatics, 7, 551-579.

Prince, E. (1978). A comparison of wh-clefts and it-clefts in discourse. Language, 54, 883-906.

Prince, E. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 223-255). New York: Academic Press.

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.

Rivers, W. (1980). Business reports: Samples from the "real world". Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Sandmann, M. (1954). Subject and predicate. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Strong, W. (1985). Linguistics and writing. In B. McClelland and T. Donovan (Eds.), Perspectives on research and scholarship in composition (pp. 68-86). New York: Modern Language Association.

Talmy, L. (1978). Relations between subordination and coordination. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language, volume 4: Syntax (pp. 487-513). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

van Dijk, T. (1977). Text and context. London: Longman.

Van Valin, R. (1984). A typology of syntactic relations in clause linkage. In C. Brugman and M. Macaulay (Ed.), Proceedings of the tenth annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistics society (pp. 542-558). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.

Wiegand, N. (1984). Creating complex sentence structure. In C. Brugman and M. Macaulay (Ed.), Proceedings of the tenth annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistics society (pp. 674-687). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.

Williams, J. (1985). Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

Williams, J. (1986). Non-linguistic linguistics and the teaching of style. In D. McQuade (Ed.), The territory of language (pp. 174-191). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

Winter, E. (1977). A clause relational approach to English texts: A study of some predictive lexical items in written discourse. Instructional science, 6, 1-92.

Witte, S., Daly, J., & Cherry, R. (1986). Syntactic complexity and writing quality. In D. McQuade (Ed.), The territory of language (pp. 150-164). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

Wolk, A. (1970). The relative importance of the final free modifier: A quantitative analysis. Research in the teaching of English, 4, 59-68.